Showing posts with label total war. Show all posts
Showing posts with label total war. Show all posts

Nov 15, 2023

Nick Turse on U.S. terror bombing during World War II

Prior to World War II, the growing trend of “terror bombing” in conflicts across China, Ethiopia, and Spain outraged Americans.  In 1937, President Franklin Roosevelt lamented that “without warning or justification of any kind, civilians, including vast numbers of women and children, are being ruthlessly murdered with bombs from the air.” 

Soon after, however, the military embraced policies that put civilians at grave risk. During World War II, a British bombing raid on Dresden, Germany, created a firestorm that ripped through the city, suffocating and cooking people alive.  A second British wave was followed by hundreds of U.S. bombers.  All told, 25,000 to 35,000 people were incinerated.  Confronted with “terror bombing” allegations after the attack, the head of U.S. Army Air Forces protested that war “must be destructive and to a certain extent inhuman and ruthless.”  Roughly 600,000 German civilians were killed in air raids during the war. 

In Japan, the U.S. attacked 67 cities, burning 180 square miles, killing more than 600,000 civilians, and leaving 8.5 million homeless.  The massive death and destruction led Secretary of War Henry Stimson to worry that the United States would “get the reputation of outdoing Hitler in atrocities.”  Nonetheless, Stimson signed off on an atomic strike on the city of Hiroshima that killed 140,000 people, mostly civilians, and another on Nagasaki, killing an estimated 70,000.  The United States has never compensated those victims’ families or survivors of the attacks.


Pablo Picasso's Guernica, 1937




Oct 21, 2023

Meirion & Susie Harries on how entry into World War I transformed America

At Cantigny and Belleau Wood, on the Marne, and across the Soissons plateau to the Vesle river, American divisions helped push the Germans back.  Their performance helped brace the Allies; but it was the promise of apparently limitless power to come that buried German hopes.  In the fall, two newly minted American armies joined the massive offensive that finally brought Germany to her knees.

So why, given such solid achievement, is America's Great War so little regarded at home?  Obviously, this conflict has been overlaid by the wars that followed, the Second World Ear in particular.  But emotion has helped make America's memory selective too - and the strongest emotion in the mix has been shame: the nineteen months of war began in a blaze of patriotic unity, and ended in bitterness, division, and regret.

American went to fight in 1917 with an innocent determination to remake the world; the nation emerged in November 1918 with its sense of purpose shattered, with its certainties shaken, and with a new and unwelcome self-knowledge.  Many Americans wanted to turn their backs on the war almost from the moment it ended.

The timing of the war could not have been worse for American society.  In 1914, the country was changing more rapidly than at any time in its history.  People were trying to come to terms with the massive industrial development that had followed the Civil War - the vast immigration it had sparked, the growth of the cities, the closing of the frontier, the new technologies and their impact on daily life and work.  War interrupted all the attempts at social reform and the search for a new, united America, and it aggravated the tensions of a society in flux.

The nature of the war increased the damage.  This was total war, the conflict not of army against army but nation against nation, and it required the mobilization of every resource, human, moral, and material; the shock was greater because few Americans had seriously contemplated the possibility of entering the war and the country had made no preparations to fight a land war in Europe.  Unplanned and uncoordinated, the mobilization exploded under a society that prided itself on being quintessentially civilian.

The federal budget grew from $742 million in 1916 to almost $14 billion in 1918, and the balance of political power shifted just as dramatically.  Where once power had been widely dispersed and shared, during the war the nation was organized and directed from the center down to the details of its dress, its food, and its conversation.  The nation surrendered itself to the draft, to censorship, to repression.  Dissent was forbidden, and even honest criticism was outlawed.  Worse, ordinary Americans volunteered to police the system, to spy on their neighbors, to condone violence and the abuse of civil rights, to participate in a shameful travesty of their former lives.

By insisting on conformity, the government placed enormous strains on this diverse society.  The emotions it whipped up to unite its people against the foreign enemy - hatred, fear, suspicion, intolerance - turned inward and ravaged the people themselves.  Blacks, radicals, religious minorities, the foreign-born, all became scapegoats for the country's ills, victims of a nativism that grew more intense as the first shoots of communism appeared on American soil in 1918.

[...]

When the peace negotiations at Versailles finally came to an end, America perceived itself as having gained nothing; the prevailing sense was of having participated in a vindictive, dishonorable treaty dictated by the Allies.  As far as they were able, Americans turned their backs on Europe and tried to return to normality.  But there was no going back for America, any more than for Britain or Russia.  Americans could not recapture the innocent optimism and self-confidence of the prewar days.  Wide rents had appeared in the social fabric of American, and the experiment of the melting pot appeared to be over.  Rudely, the war had thrust Americans into the uncertain future of the twentieth century: its consequences are our legacy today.

~ Meirion & Susie Harries, The Last Days of Innocence: America at War, 1917-1918 (1997), prologue, pp. 7-9



Oct 11, 2023

Connor O'Keefe on war, revenge and killing civilians

War is no trivial subject.  It’s violence on the widest scale.  At their best, wars can throw off the worst tyrannies and liberate the oppressed.  But they can also bring about the worst atrocities. 

That’s why it is so important to have a firm and precise understanding of when violence is justified.  History shows that without this it is far too easy for our healthy human reactions and emotions to be funneled into support for further crimes—trapping us in indiscriminate revenge cycles.

~ Connor O'Keefe, "Is It Just War or Unjustified Slaughter of Innocents?," Mises Wire, October 11, 2023



Sep 12, 2021

Tom DiLorenzo on precedents set by the Civil War

Americans are still fascinated by the war because many of us recognize it as the defining event in American history.  Lincoln’s war established myriad precedents that have shaped the course of American government and society ever since: the centralization of governmental power, central banking, income taxation, protectionism, military conscription, the suspension of constitutional liberties, the "rewriting" of the Constitution by federal judges, "total war," the quest for a worldwide empire, and the notion that government is one big "problem solver."

Perhaps the most hideous precedent established by Lincoln’s war, however, was the intentional targeting of defenseless civilians.  Human beings did not always engage in such barbaric acts as we have all watched in horror in recent days [9/11].  Targeting civilians has been a common practice ever since World War II, but its roots lie in Lincoln’s war.

~ Tom DiLorenzo, "Targeting Civilians," LewRockwell.com, September 17, 2001



Feb 8, 2020

Jane Lancaster on W.T. Sherman's lessons from the Second Seminole War

Sherman gradually developed his own ideas about war. He thought that the War Department should fill Florida with troops, declare martial law, and fight to exterminate the enemy. According to Sherman, this was the most economical plan.

~ Jane F. Lancaster, "William Tecumseh Sherman's Introduction to War, 1840-1842: Lesson for Action," Florida Historical Quarterly, 72: 1 (July 1993), pp. 65-66

(as cited by Joseph Stromberg, "Sherman in the Swamp," LewRockwell.com, February 21, 2003)

Image result for young william tecumseh sherman

Jan 3, 2020

William Tecumseh Sherman on exterminating the Sioux Indians

We must act with vindictive earnestness against the Sioux, even to their extermination, men, women and children... during an assault, the soldiers cannot pause to distinguish between male and female, or even discriminate as to age.

~ General William Tecumseh Sherman

Sitting Bull
1989