Tracy Thurman on why the Amish are a critical control group that must preserved

Fifty years ago, most Amish men were farmers.  Twenty-five years ago, it was down to about half.  Today, only a small minority continue to farm, and that number continues to shrink.  The rest become carpenters or tradesmen, and some are forced to adopt technology in order to survive.  Inevitably, their young men bring home influences from the modern world which impact their families.  The culture also depends on sons working alongside their fathers, learning work ethic and mastering manhood.  Because of child labor laws, carpenters and tradesmen cannot bring their sons to work with them the way farmers can – and it’s having a significant impact on the next generation. 

I’ve discussed this issue with hundreds of members of the Amish community, and there is a grave consensus: If they keep losing their farms, they will lose their way of life forever.  Their churches may still meet, the people will still exist, and the name may not change, but Amish culture as we know it will be a thing of the past, and the control group for Big Tech, Big Pharma, Big Medicine, and Big Education and the welfare state will be gone, along with one of the best sources of real food in our nation. 

I believe there are powerful interests that would love such an outcome, because the Amish way of life is drawing far more attention now than it ever has, and is inspiring others to look for ways to escape the control grid.  Many Americans have begun to notice that by opting out of the Great Reset policies, the Amish are healthier, happier, and have stronger communities.  This social control group shows us that you don’t need 16 or 20 years of educational indoctrination from government schools in order to be a productive member of society. 

They demonstrate the benefits of choosing not to be slaves to our technology.  We see that children thrive without screen time, have superior mental health as a result, and fare better when they roam outdoors, get sun exposure, get dirty, and learn to work alongside their family.  Amish health outcomes indicate that kids who are not subjected to dozens of injections have far lower levels of ADHD and autism, and few allergies or autoimmune diseases either.  We can observe that nutrient-dense, farm-fresh foods can help prevent obesity, heal disease, and cut dependence on Big Pharma. 

The Amish show us all these truths, and the would-be controllers of our society don’t like this.  When one runs a society-wide experiment of technological addiction, of social fragmentation, of scaring people out of having children, of government school indoctrination, of universal vaccination, digital ID, digital wallets, and vaccine passports, it’s a problem if the human lab rats in the experiment can look outside the cage and see that another life is possible. 

~ Tracy Thurman, "The Amish: A Control Group for Technofeudalism," Brownstone Institute, September 16, 2024

Jacob Gershman on the sell-or-ban TikTok law

The litigants have asked the D.C. Circuit to rule by Dec. 6 so there is enough time for the Supreme Court to potentially review the case before the law takes effect. 

The law doesn’t make it a crime to use TikTok, but it does prohibit mobile app stores from letting users download or update it. 

The sell-or-ban law gained bipartisan support after lawmakers received warnings from the intelligence community about China’s ability to exploit the app used by some 170 million Americans, roughly half of the population. ByteDance has said it can’t and won’t sell its U.S. operations by the deadline. The Chinese government has also signaled that it won’t allow a forced sale of TikTok to go through. 

Much of the government’s evidence is classified and shielded not just from the public but from TikTok’s lawyers. They said in court papers that the U.S. government hasn’t shown them any evidence that China has manipulated the content that Americans see on TikTok or that China has accessed U.S. user data.

The U.S. government has shown the judges statements from senior intelligence officials about the dangers posed by TikTok and a transcript of a classified House committee hearing from March that fueled the legislation’s passage. Publicly viewable portions of the filings intimate that the government’s national-security concerns are more than hypothetical. 

Casey Blackburn, a senior U.S. intelligence official, wrote in a heavily redacted filing that TikTok’s parent company has a “demonstrated history of manipulating the content on their platforms, including at the direction of the PRC [People’s Republic of China].”

TikTok says it has spent $2 billion walling off U.S. user data on Oracle-owned U.S.-based servers—measures that the U.S. government says fail to adequately insulate TikTok from Chinese influence or prevent user data from being accessed by ByteDance employees located in China. 

~ Jacob Gershman, "Court Appears Skeptical of TikTok’s Challenge to U.S. Ban: Judges are considering the validity of legislation that could shut down Chinese-backed app used by half of Americans," The Wall Street Journal, September 16, 2024

Shou Zi Chew, TikTok’s CEO, in Washington in March