There is no free lunch. Polices like negative interest rates and Quantitative Easing are doing damage to the underlying economic engine. They misallocate capital, discourage thrift and promote fast money over slowly building wealth. At the end of the day, central banks are not all powerful. They are not immune to the laws of economics.
~ Kevin Duffy, "Central Bankers Are Starting to Lose Control," The Market, November 19, 2019
Nov 30, 2019
Marc Faber on why younger Americans are poorer than previous generations
There is a reason for younger Americans to be in worse financial straits than the generations that preceded them. Aside from large borrowings (student debts are up from less than $50 billion in 1999 to more than $1.5 trillion in 2019), the millennials are also poor investors. Just like other individual investors they lack the discipline to implement a consistent investment strategy, and most importantly, patience. In addition, they trade far too frequently and chase the most popular stocks.
~ Marc Faber, Market Commentary, December 1, 2019
~ Marc Faber, Market Commentary, December 1, 2019
Nov 29, 2019
Tom Woods on entry level jobs and mindset behind minimum wage laws
When you have an entry-level job anyone can be trained to do in an hour, you're not in a strong bargaining position.
The point of an entry-level job isn't to make a career out of it, much less try to support a household on it. It's to give you experience and an opportunity to hit the first rung of the employment ladder.
Or it's to give you an income while you learn a skill in your spare time -- an option the Internet has made simpler than ever.
When only one company, and no one else in the world, thinks you're worth even minimum wage, be thankful for that. If you must be angry, be angry at everyone who refused to hire you at all. Why be angry at the one place that did?
~ Tom Woods
The point of an entry-level job isn't to make a career out of it, much less try to support a household on it. It's to give you experience and an opportunity to hit the first rung of the employment ladder.
Or it's to give you an income while you learn a skill in your spare time -- an option the Internet has made simpler than ever.
When only one company, and no one else in the world, thinks you're worth even minimum wage, be thankful for that. If you must be angry, be angry at everyone who refused to hire you at all. Why be angry at the one place that did?
~ Tom Woods
Nov 26, 2019
Walter Cronkite on war and peace
War itself is, of course, a form of madness. It's hardly a civilized pursuit. It's amazing how we spend so much time inventing devices to kill each other and so little time working on how to achieve peace.
~ Walter Cronkite
~ Walter Cronkite
Henry Paulson on the trade war with China
It should concern every one of us who cares about the state of the global economy that the positive-sum metaphors of healthy economic competition are giving way to zero-sum metaphors of military competition.
~ Henry Paulson, former Treasury Secretary, in a speech in Beijing
(as cited in the November 25, 2019 print version of Barron's)
~ Henry Paulson, former Treasury Secretary, in a speech in Beijing
(as cited in the November 25, 2019 print version of Barron's)
Carl von Clausewitz on war and politics
War is merely the continuation of politics by other means.
~ Carl von Clausewitz
~ Carl von Clausewitz
Nov 23, 2019
George Will on the Greek protesters
Dependency is the agenda of the other [progressive] side. It is the agenda to make more and more people dependent and more and more things on the government. Where we can now see today in the headlines from Europe where that leads. It leads to the streets of Athens. Where we had described by media as anti-government mobs. The anti-government mobs were composed almost entirely of government employees.
~ George Will, keynote address at the 2010 Milton Friedman Prize dinner, sponsored by the Cato Institute, 10:10 mark, May 13, 2010
~ George Will, keynote address at the 2010 Milton Friedman Prize dinner, sponsored by the Cato Institute, 10:10 mark, May 13, 2010
David Stockman on the perceived Russian military threat to the U.S.
Russia’s pint-sized economy can not support a military establishment anywhere near to that of Imperial Washington.
To wit, its $61 billion of military outlays in 2018 amounted to less than 32 days of Washington’s current $750 billion of expenditures for defense. Indeed, it might well be asked how Russia could remotely threaten homeland security in America short of what would be a suicidal nuclear first strike.
That’s because the 1,600 deployed nuclear weapons on each side represent a continuation of mutual deterrence (MAD) – the arrangement by which we got through 45-years of cold war when the Kremlin was run by a totalitarian oligarchy committed to a hostile ideology; and during which time it had been armed to the teeth via a forced-draft allocation of upwards of 40% of the GDP of the Soviet empire to the military.
By comparison, the Russian defense budget currently amounts to less than 4% of the country’s anemic present day economy – one shorn of the vast territories and populations of Belarus, Ukraine, Georgia, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and all the Asian “stans” among others. Yet given those realities we are supposed to believe that the self-evidently calculating and cautious kleptomaniac who runs the Kremlin is going to go mad, defy MAD and trigger a nuclear Armageddon?
Indeed, the idea that Russia presents a national security threat to America is laughable. Not only would Putin never risk nuclear suicide, but even that fantasy is the extent of what he’s got. That is, Russia’s conventional capacity to project force to the North American continent is nonexistent – or at best, lies somewhere between nichts and nothing.
~ David Stockman, "Congrats, Dems! You've Empowered a Pack of Paranoid Neocon Morons," LewRockwell.com, November 23, 2019
To wit, its $61 billion of military outlays in 2018 amounted to less than 32 days of Washington’s current $750 billion of expenditures for defense. Indeed, it might well be asked how Russia could remotely threaten homeland security in America short of what would be a suicidal nuclear first strike.
That’s because the 1,600 deployed nuclear weapons on each side represent a continuation of mutual deterrence (MAD) – the arrangement by which we got through 45-years of cold war when the Kremlin was run by a totalitarian oligarchy committed to a hostile ideology; and during which time it had been armed to the teeth via a forced-draft allocation of upwards of 40% of the GDP of the Soviet empire to the military.
By comparison, the Russian defense budget currently amounts to less than 4% of the country’s anemic present day economy – one shorn of the vast territories and populations of Belarus, Ukraine, Georgia, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and all the Asian “stans” among others. Yet given those realities we are supposed to believe that the self-evidently calculating and cautious kleptomaniac who runs the Kremlin is going to go mad, defy MAD and trigger a nuclear Armageddon?
Indeed, the idea that Russia presents a national security threat to America is laughable. Not only would Putin never risk nuclear suicide, but even that fantasy is the extent of what he’s got. That is, Russia’s conventional capacity to project force to the North American continent is nonexistent – or at best, lies somewhere between nichts and nothing.
~ David Stockman, "Congrats, Dems! You've Empowered a Pack of Paranoid Neocon Morons," LewRockwell.com, November 23, 2019
Nov 21, 2019
Ludwig von Mises: "The market economy involves peaceful cooperation"
The market economy involves peaceful cooperation. It bursts asunder when the citizens turn into warriors and, instead of exchanging commodities and services, fight one
another.
~ Ludwig von Mises, Human Action (1949)
~ Ludwig von Mises, Human Action (1949)
Nov 6, 2019
Edward Snowden on the forming of beliefs at an early age
At the age of 22, when I entered the American intelligence community, I didn't have any politics. Like most young people, I had solid convictions that I refused to accept weren't truly mine but rather a contradictory cluster of inherited principles. My mind was a mashup of the values I was raised with and the ideals I encountered online. It took me until my late twenties to finally understand that so much of what I believed—or what I thought I believed—was just youthful imprinting. We learn to speak by imitating the speech of the adults around us, and in the process of that learning we wind up also imitating their opinions until we've deluded ourselves into thinking that the words we're using are our own.
~ Edward Snowden, "I Went to Work for the Government and I Found a Failed System," Reason.com, November 5, 2019
~ Edward Snowden, "I Went to Work for the Government and I Found a Failed System," Reason.com, November 5, 2019
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)